Social Media
National Center Presents
Category Archives

The official blog of the National Center for Public Policy Research, covering news, current events and public policy from a conservative, free-market and pro-Constitution perspective.

501 Capitol Court, NE
Washington, D.C. 20002
(202) 543-4110
Fax (202) 543-5975

Search
Monthly Archives
Twitter feeds
« "Economic Consequences" of Obama's EPA Regulations Dangerous, Says Project 21's Borelli | Main | Video: Project 21's Deneen Borelli Talks Jobs on Fox »
Monday
Aug222011

Does Mayor Bloomberg Stand to Profit from Sierra Club's "Beyond Coal" Campaign?

I ran into this anti-coal advertisement by Michael Bloomberg when visiting a Tina Korbe post on HotAir.com:

BloombergBeyondCoalHotAir080711

Michael Bloomberg did not become a billionaire and a successful politician without knowing a few tricks. As the National Center for Public Policy Research has pointed out more than once, a trick of some politically-connected businessmen is to invest heavily in something, and then move government policy in the direction of supporting it (e.g., General Electric and solar power, the Pickens Plan, or Al Gore and global warming), via tax subsidies, laws or regulations.

Michael Bloomberg has just donated $50 million to the Sierra Club's "Beyond Coal" campaign.

He has posted a video of himself talking about "a new energy path" on his YouTube channel.

He writes op-eds about cutting America's coal supplies.

His personal website covers coal prominently and claims it is important for the country (read: government) to "accelerate the transition to cleaner, cost-effective energy sources."

MikeBloombergCom080711

Yet, 56 percent of America's electricity is generated from burning coal.

And his Sierra Club partner has opposed generating electricity with nuclear power for nearly 40 years.

SierraClubNuclearEnergy080711

And opposes large-scale hydropower, too.

SierraClubHydropower080711

And Bloomberg does not seem to be a big backer of new methods for obtaining natural gas.

What will Americans do without 56 percent of our electricity? Does Michael Bloomberg expect us to do without, or to get it from some other technology?

If so, which? And is he invested in that technology?

Will he profit when coal plants are shut down? While Americans lose one of our lowest-cost sources of electricity? And all those coal jobs?

I noticed Mayor Bloomberg tweets about ending coal.

BloombergTweetsCoal080711

So I tweeted back a question.

BloombergBeyondCoalTweet080711

That was on August 7.

Still waiting.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend